Holländische Sozialdemokraten: "Verbot von Pilzen aufheben"
Lea Bouwmeester, Abgeordneter der niederländischen Sozialdemokraten (PvdA) sagte, sie würde das viel kritisierte Verbot von Pilzen gerne wieder rückgängig machen. Sie behauptet, das Verbot sei unwirksam und schiesst am eigentlichen Probleme vorbei.
Sie glaubt, der gemeinsame Konsum von Alkohol und Drogen unter Touristen ist das Hauptproblem und nicht die Verwendung von Pilzen. "Die Statistik beweist dies, 95 Prozent der Rufe von Krankenwagen in Zusammenhang mit Drogen beziehen sich auf Touristen, die mehrere verschieden Drogen auf einmal genommen haben, oft zusammen mit Alkohol."
Ebenso wie der Bürgermeister von Amsterdam 2007 vorgeschlagen hat will Bouwmeester den Verkauf der Pilze regulieren und Menschen zwingen über die Verwendung, durch die Einführung einer dreitägigen Wartezeit zwischen Erwerb und Verbrauch, nachzudenken.
Vor kurzem kündigten zwei andere politischen Parteien, GroenLinks (die Grünen) und D66 (Demokraten 66) an, dass sie gegen das Verbot und zu Gunsten einer Regulierung des Verkaufs sind.
|
|
|
Kommentare
gaboss - 2009-10-15 18:37:27
*yaay* bring back the shrooms, so you can save your economy *grins*(and nobody will notice your veeeery slow ban of cannabis *wink*)
diocane - 2009-10-15 20:35:31
Reading around on the web it really seems that dutch government is not able to make up its mind on drug related matters...Maybe someone willing to reopen the recently closed coffeeshops?
Well good news anyhow..
Lev - 2009-10-15 20:41:35
I get the impression that this 3-day wait policy is not necessarily just acting to encourage people to re-think their decision, but is probably more realistically a way or trying to prevent the use of mushrooms by touristy types, by requiring planning. After all, wasn't it some stupid French tourist who killed herself that lead to people taking notice of the the "possible harm" when used by people who shouldn't be using them..?But personally, I find the whole scenario incredibly hypocritical in light of Hollands justification for allowing the sell of Cannabis - that it is a health issue (not criminal) and since its negative effects are fairly small in scope that its better to regulate things (as they do somewhat with Cannabis) instead of outright prohibiting them. I mean, is that just me, or shouldn't mushrooms fall into that same philosophy..?






Warenkorb
Kundenservice
Bestellinfo










adoma - 2009-10-14 16:46:04
Every fucking mushroom except the sclerotia is banned, except for homegrow.
I'm happy with that for i can still grow and therefore still use every shroom.
Alcohol, tabacco and weed is also beeing supressed by Klinks ashole politics.
But now this hippy politician of the BACKSTABBING PvdA is bringing this IN THE NEWS and trying to be popular, by saying it's also the cause of other drugs and alcohol.
And since minister Klink is a fucking jack-ass, it wouldn't surprise me that he will ban EVERY DRUGS, COMPLETELY!
Leave it alone and fuck the tourists!
The shroom is holy and not some tourist attraction.